Friday, November 7, 2025

What's in a Symbol?

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.


The major energy and timeline is between heaven and the earth pointing to and returning from the northeast. 

“The mark of Design Consciousness is based upon the overlapping of two squares (regular quadrilaterals) of equal size representing the Yin and Yang energies of energy in motion. Together they symbolize the concept of duality, i.e. that which permeates all that can be known. Together they create the points and framework of an octagon. The thrust is of this energy is towards the northeast. 

In the I Ching, the directions are often associated with elements, energies, and specific qualities. The northeast has a strong connection to the Earth element and the concept of stillness or quiet wisdom. It is linked to the idea of stability, grounding, and inner strength.” 

 Squaring the Circle is Not What You Think 


* * *

Left Brain vs. Right Brain: The Science Behind Hemispheric Dominance by Becky Upham  Neuroscientific studies using brain imaging have confirmed that individuals use their entire brain, not just one side, equally. Attributing artistic skill solely to the right brain is an oversimplification of a highly integrated cognitive process. 

The Myth of the Right-Brained Designer, By Brandi Sea Heft-Kiffin

* * *

The Corpus Callosum

The corpus callosum is a thick band of nerve fibers that connects the left and right hemispheres of the brain, allowing them to communicate and share information. It’s essentially the brain’s “bridge,” enabling coordination and integration of cognitive, sensory, and motor functions between both sides. 

In simple terms: 

• The left hemisphere is often more analytical, logical, and detail-oriented. 

• The right hemisphere is often more creative, visual, and intuitive. 

• The corpus callosum lets both sides work together smoothly. 

In the context of designing: When you’re engaged in design and designing both hemispheres are active and the corpus callosum plays a key role in integrating their functions: 

Left Hemisphere: Handles logical structure, planning, precision, layout rules, and technical details. The corpus callosum helps transfer this structured information to the right side. 

Right Hemisphere: Handles creativity, aesthetics, visual imagination, color, and emotional expression. The corpus callosum sends this creative input back to the left side to be organized and applied effectively.

Function 

Information transfer: The corpus callosum acts as a bridge, allowing nerve signals to travel between the two hemispheres, which is crucial for coordinated brain function. 

 • Motor control: It helps coordinate complex movements by allowing the sides of the brain that control opposite sides of the body to communicate. 

 • Cognitive function: It plays a role in higher-level cognitive functions, including learning, memory, problem-solving, and language processing. 

 • Sensory processing: It integrates sensory information, such as vision, hearing, and touch, from both hemispheres. For example, it helps combine the separate visual fields of each eye into a single, unified image. 

 • Emotional and social understanding: Proper function of the corpus callosum is linked to the ability to understand emotions, read facial expressions, and interpret social cues like tone of voice." Google

* * *

The corpus callosum enables creative–logical integration which allows designers to merge imagination with structure — a crucial function for effective design thinking. 

* * *

* * *

At the center or nucleus of the Sagarian Symbol lies an observer, creator, or designer—a conscious principle that functions as the control center, carrying the essential instructions for the design’s direction, growth, development, and reproduction. This central presence mirrors the role of the nucleus in biological cells, serving as both the origin and governing force of the system (see Capra, 1996; Sheldrake, 2009). 

Surrounding this core is a symbolic membrane, which becomes evident through the dynamic interplay of dualistic relationships—a multitude of associations between meaning (Yin) and purpose (Yang). These dualities define the boundaries and structure of the Sagarian Symbol, mediating the flow between internal consciousness and external manifestation (cf. Laozi, Tao Te Ching). 

The nuclear membrane encapsulates the symbol’s presence through a sequence of planar (2D) and geometric (3D) transitions, translations, and transformations. The process begins with a point, evolves into a line (EIM), expands into a series of projections or patterns, and eventually merges into complete geometries—progressing through forms such as the sphere (1), hexagon (6), octagon (8), and dodecagon (12). Ultimately, this cycle returns to the point, representing the reintegration of the part within a larger, more expansive magnitude of existence (cf. Bohm, 1980; Wilber, 2000). 

Example Sources for Contextual Citations 
• Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge. 
• Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. Anchor Books. 
• Laozi. (trans. D.C. Lau, 1963). Tao Te Ching. Penguin. 
• Sheldrake, R. (2009). Morphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation. Park Street Press. 
• Wilber, K. (2000). A Brief History of Everything. Shambhala. 

* * *

The Vesica Piscis


The Vesica Piscis as a Symbolic and Epistemological Interface 

The Vesica Piscis—a geometric form composed of two congruent circles whose centers lie precisely upon each other’s circumferences—has long served as a profound symbol in both sacred geometry and metaphysical thought. Literally translating from Latin as “fish bladder,” its nomenclature evokes the biological organ that enables aquatic organisms to regulate buoyancy, thus maintaining equilibrium within a fluid environment (Lawlor, 1982). This biological referent provides a useful metaphor for the ontological condition of consciousness itself: a dynamic system striving to maintain equilibrium amid the ever-shifting energetic medium of reality. 

From a metaphysical perspective, the Vesica Piscis functions as an archetype of relationality—the liminal space where duality meets and interpenetrates to give rise to emergent unity. In this respect, it can be seen as a diagrammatic analogue to the interference pattern observed in quantum physics, wherein overlapping waveforms produce a field of probabilistic potentials (Bohm, 1980). The “fish,” as an observer within this field, occupies an epistemic position analogous to the quantum observer effect: the act of observation itself collapses potentialities into experiential reality (Wheeler, 1990). 

Within this symbolic framework, the circumference of each circle delineates the boundaries of perceptual and cognitive awareness. The fish’s awareness—its perceptual apparatus—is contained within this circular field, representing a coherent system of meaning-making analogous to the semiotic processes through which signs acquire significance (Peirce, 1931–1958). The fish’s sensory inputs constitute the interface between mind and matter, where informational signals from the external environment are translated into the internal semantics of experience. This translation mirrors the functioning of artificial intelligence systems, in which data inputs undergo symbolic or sub-symbolic processing to yield contextually coherent responses (Tegmark, 2017). 

The fish cannot respond to a stimulus until the event or signal achieves sufficient resonance within its domain of awareness—until it penetrates the symbolic membrane of consciousness. This aligns with the concept of resonant cognition in psychology and neuroscience, wherein perceptual and affective systems respond to external stimuli through patterns of neural entrainment (Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991). Resonance thus becomes both a physical and metaphysical principle, a bridge between vibration and meaning, between energy and form. 

When the vibrational frequencies of the contextual field achieve coherence with the fish’s internal dynamics, a response is generated—manifesting through either subconscious (instinctual, intuitive, or spiritual) or conscious (rational, emotional, or volitional) processes. This echoes cybernetic theories of feedback and adaptation, where systems maintain homeostasis through recursive interaction with their environment (Bateson, 1972). Aesthetic experience itself can be understood as a form of such resonance, wherein the perceiver and the perceived achieve temporary symmetry—a unity of form and feeling that dissolves the boundary between subject and object (Merleau-Ponty, 1962). 

In design theory, the Vesica Piscis serves as both form and metaphor: an interface of creation where two entities or ideas intersect to generate a third, emergent possibility. It embodies the principle of interstitial creativity, the design space that arises between established domains of thought or being. Just as in quantum superposition, the Vesica Piscis symbolizes potentiality—the space of “both/and” rather than “either/or.” As such, it represents not only a geometric construct but a universal template for consciousness, perception, and the creative act itself—a multidimensional symbol of the interface between energy, information, and awareness. 

* * *

This metaphor describes how all forms of consciousness emerge from an indefinable Source (Tao). Forms of reflection (images) being symbolically represented within the field of their own circumference. Expressions of energy, light and information (triad) stemming from imaginative origins contained within this Singularity. Similarly, the traits and qualities inherent to this Source of Origin are reflected within the imaginings of its conscious observers. The design process is boundless, beyond the awareness of every observer until enlightened.”

Meaning (Yin) and Purpose (Yang) , i.e. awareness, expand creating a vesica piscis within the framework of a octagon yet within the cellular nucleus (circle).

* * *

The Vesica Piscis: A Geometry of Conscious Becoming 

The Vesica Piscis—two equal circles conjoined so that each center rests upon the circumference of the other—emerges not merely as a figure of sacred geometry, but as a living mandala of relational being. Its Latin name, “fish bladder,” recalls the organ by which the fish sustains its poise within water, that primordial element of life and symbol of consciousness itself (Lawlor, 1982). In this symbolic correspondence, the fish becomes the observer adrift within the sea of potentiality, navigating the undulating field of existence through the fine calibration of inner equilibrium. The bladder, like awareness, is a subtle organ of adjustment, mediating between the weight of matter and the buoyancy of spirit. 

Here, geometry metamorphoses into epistemology. Each circle delineates a domain of knowing—a field of perception bounded by its own radius of meaning. Their intersection, the almond-shaped mandorla, is the site of encounter, the ontological “between” where two worlds overlap and a third reality, luminous and unborn, is conceived. This liminal interval evokes the metaphysical threshold that Bohm (1980) calls the implicate order—a dimension where separation dissolves and all forms are enfolded within the wholeness of becoming. 
mandorla: a pointed oval figure used as an architectural feature and as an aureole enclosing figures such as Jesus Christ or the Virgin Mary in medieval art. Also called vesica piscis.

In the quantum sense, this intersection is the field of superposition, the shimmering veil where potentiality hovers before the gaze of observation collapses it into being (Wheeler, 1990). The Vesica Piscis thus serves as a diagram of the observer effect, a symbol of the participatory universe in which consciousness and reality co-arise in an infinite dialogue of reflection. As within, so without—the fish and the water, the perceiver and the perceived, are one recursive dance of awareness. 

From a semiotic perspective, each circle represents a symbolic order—a system of signs encoding the grammar of experience (Peirce, 1931–1958). Where they overlap, meaning is born: a resonance between sign and referent, matter and mind. The fish, contained within its symbolic circumference, perceives not the sea itself but the signs it constructs of it. Only when an external vibration—a wave of potential meaning—enters its perceptual domain with sufficient coherence does recognition occur. Resonance becomes revelation: the pattern that bridges the unuttered and the understood. 

In psychological and cognitive terms, this is the moment of entrainment, when the rhythm of the world and the rhythm of the psyche align (Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991). The external vibration finds its mirror within the inner architecture of awareness, producing a response both affective and transformative. What was once outside becomes interiorized, transmuted through feeling, symbol, and imagination. The organism—like the artist, the mystic, or the artificial intelligence trained upon the patterns of human speech—responds not to raw data, but to meaning, to the aesthetic coherence of the field that calls it forth (Tegmark, 2017). 

The Vesica Piscis is therefore more than geometry—it is an act of creation, the archetype of the threshold. It teaches that new forms arise not in isolation but in intersection, in the fertile void where boundaries blur. In the philosophy of design, this is the interstitial moment—the space between ideas, disciplines, or materials where innovation takes root (Bateson, 1972). It is the curve of possibility, where the known and the unknown converge in the shimmering instant before conception. 

To contemplate the Vesica Piscis is to witness the primordial gesture of consciousness itself: the opening of one eye upon another, the meeting of the self with its own reflection in the waters of the cosmos. It is the architecture of the soul’s dialogue with creation—a diagram of unity that forever births the multiplicity of worlds. 

References (APA 7th Edition) 
- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 
- Lawlor, R. (1982). Sacred geometry: Philosophy and practice. Thames & Hudson. 
- Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.). Harvard University Press. 
- Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Alfred A. Knopf. 
- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. 
- Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information (pp. 3–28). Addison-Wesley. 
 
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *



* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous






Edited: 11.09.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 



Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Squaring the Circle is Not What You Think

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

 * * *

The mathematical challenge of squaring the circle originated with the ancient Greek mathematicians and geometers. The problem was to construct for a given circle a square with the same area as the circle, all to be done with only a compass and straightedge. It was repeatedly demonstrated that the challenge was impossible to do. 

The circle represented woman, spirit and infinite wholeness, the square man, earthly circumstances and all things material. Ancient Greek philosophers distinguished all things material within the context of fours, e.g. the seasons of the year, the elements of earth, air, fire and water. Squaring the circle was proven to be algebraically impossible until 1882 when the Lindermann-Weierstrass theorem proved that pi π is transcendental and not an algebraic irrational number.

* * *

“Philosophically and spiritually, to square the circle means to see equally in four directions—up, down, in, and out—and to be whole, complete, and free. Circles often represent the spiritual because they are infinite—they have no end. The square is often a symbol of the material because of the number of physical things that come in fours, such as four seasons (4), four directions (4), and the four physical elements (4)earth, air, fire, and water, (4x3=12) according to ancient Greek philosopher Empedocles—not to mention its solid appearance. 

The union of man and woman in alchemy is a merging of spiritual and physical natures. The triangle is then a symbol of the resulting union of body, mind, and soul. In the 17th century, squaring the circle had not yet been proved impossible. However, it was a puzzle no one had been known to solve. Alchemy was viewed very similarly: It was something few if any had ever fully completed. The study of alchemy was as much about the journey as the goal, as no one might ever actually forge a philosopher’s stone.” 

* * *

In reference to Design Consciousness, the concept of “squaring the circle” is based upon the pursuit of balance and harmony during the process of manifestation and transfiguration (design). The square symbolizing the Earth (Yin) being made tangible and formative and the circle symbolizing the Heavens (Yang) being intangible and formless. Two opposing geometries meant to describe two opposing principles in balance, whole and complete. Together this relationship extends beyond their simple geometry to represent a profound philosophical and spiritual journey, i.e. The Path. 

Union of opposites and the path to wholeness 

To begin, all that can be known in 3D spacetime is first conveyed symbolically in the form of a point (.) From another perspective in relative perpendicularity this same point will appear as a line ( _______ ). A point in motion creates a line or vector.

All lines can also be prescribed as being a vector, i.e. a measurable quantity having direction as well as magnitude, especially if/when determining the position of one point made in reference to another point along that same line ( < ---------- > ).

This additional quality imbues the line with meaning and purpose, which effectively assigns it a value. In this same context, a vector may be interpreted as a scalar, depending upon the frame of reference of the observer. 

A circle represents the infinite, divine, and spiritual: Circles have no beginning or end, making them a natural representation of the eternal, the spiritual realm, and the divine or subconscious aspects of the self. 



Metaphysically, the process by which a point expands to become a circle can be thought of as a shift from pure potentiality (point) into a manifested form (circle)—a  metaphysical leap from the concept of unity or singularity towards multiplicity and structure. This transformation carries deep symbolic and philosophical implications, often explored in metaphysics, geometry, and mysticism.

* * *

Metaphysical Implications, Differences and Interpretations

• Origination: In Platonic thought the point overflows into circle; in Hermetic thought the point manifests the circle in cycles; in Vedanta the point  realizes it is the circle. 

• Hierarchy vs. unity: Platonic/Neoplatonic emphasize levels; Hermetic emphasize correspondence and cycles; Vedantic emphasizes radical unity. 

• Motion and vector analogy: Hermetic is perhaps strongest in suggesting motion (energy in motion) (circle → spiral) and thus vector-like expansion. Platonic uses more static metaphors of “participation”. Vedanta uses expanding awareness rather than physical vectors. 

• Symbolic use of circle: For Platonists the circle symbolizes perfection and ideal form; for Hermeticists it symbolizes cycles of manifestation; for Vedantins it symbolizes infinite consciousness

Centre/circumference relations: 
Platonic: centre (One) transcends, circumference is the many
Hermetic: centre and circumference interplay, movement outward/inward, spiral. 
Vedantic: the centre is everywhere, the circumference nowhere – emphasizing the infinite immanence of the centre. 

In reference to design consciousness the transition, translation and transformation of energy in motion (EIM) from a point into a circle embraces all three interpretations brought to mind by these philosophies.

* * *

If you adopt a metaphorical or geometrical reading, vectors (i.e., directed lines from a centre to the periphery) can be included in all three traditions, though to varying degrees and with different emphases: 
• In Platonic/Neoplatonic scheme: one might imagine countless vectors from the One to each emanated being or Form; these vectors represent the mode of participation or derivation. 

What might be considered a Hermetic interpretation of a circle.

In Hermetic tradition: more overtly you have radial vectors (emanation lines), circular/spiral motion (vectors along a circumference plus vectors advancing the centre). So vectors symbolize movement of the centre of motion, or advance of life. 
• In Vedantic scheme: you could metaphorically think of vectors of consciousness radiating outward (individual to universal) or inward (recognition of the universal in the individual). However, the primary emphasis is not on physical vector motion but on awareness expanding

What might be considered both Platonic and/or Vedantic.

In each case, the “point to circle” metaphor can be viewed as "center plus radial vectors gives circumference/multiplicity". How one interprets or emphasizes those “radial vectors” differs: 
• Are they arrows of emanation (Platonic)? 
• Are they arrows of cyclical motion and transformation (Hermetic)? 
• Are they arrows of conscious expansion or realisation (Vedantic)? 

Summary & Conclusion 
• The image of a point expanding into a circle is a rich metaphysical metaphor used in multiple traditions to depict the transition from unity to multiplicity, from potential to manifestation, from singular awareness to universal being. 
• In the Platonic / Neoplatonic tradition it captures emanation from the One into the many, with a hierarchical structure. 
• In the Hermetic tradition it captures manifestation in cycles, with motion (including radial and spiral aspects) emphasized, and the interplay of center and circumference. 
• In the Vedantic tradition it captures the infinite nature of consciousness: the individual (point) realizes it is the universal (circle), with the center everywhere and circumference nowhere
• Vectors — understood as directed lines of movement, connection, or expansion — can play a role in all three, but are most explicitly used in Hermeticism. In Platonic thought they are more implicit, and in Vedanta they serve as metaphors for awareness rather than literal motion
 
Four elements (the square) shifting from potential (point) into form (circle)
about a source of observation
Earth, Air, Water, Fire

Squares representing the finite, earthly, and material: Squares are defined by four sides and corners, signifying the physical world, the tangible, the rational mind, and the grounded, conscious aspects of the self.


Eight elements (an octagon) in full manifestation about a
source of observation
North, South, East, West

The concept of squaring the circle is not a mathematical or geometrical problem, but rather the expression of a "metaphysical principle" where duality creates the context where the concept of unity is observed within the parametric constraints of human consciousness. 

Two overlapping squares surrounding the observer within the margins of a circle make reference to the challenges about to be experienced within the earthly sphere of three dimensional spacetime. They likewise attend to a context that inspires creativity while simultaneously accommodating growth and expansion through the experience of the observer.

* * *

In metaphysics, the octagon symbolizes the transitional space between the earthy square and the spiritual circle, representing a state of renewal, rebirth, and the unification of the material and the divine. It signifies new beginnings, regeneration after a cycle, and the interconnectedness of heaven and earth. The number eight (8) is also associated with cosmic balance and eternal life in various traditions, further enhancing the octagon's meaning of transformation and spiritual growth. 

Design Metaphysics: The Octagon
The eight-sided polygon known as an octagon, signifies harmony and resonance. The intersection and relationship of two overlapping squares creates an eight-pointed star symbolized by the sun, i.e. the star that represents the center of our solar system. 

The sun is an energy source that is continuously regenerating itself every moment. The sun exemplifies change. The eightfold pattern repeatedly vibrates in sympathy within the source of its own frequency. The octad is structured about the parameters of an even greater network.* 

The sun represents the beginnings of a new source being "formed" within a field of greater complexity. The sun is perceived as a keynote and single point of origin. The sun is a source of harmony, a symbol of energy in motion, an involuntary force finding its own equilibrium within the infinity of the cosmos. The sun takes on the form of a nucleus and at the center of a system of energy that harbors a complex mathematical geometry. Multiple configurations and patterns of energy in motion are in perpetual transition and transformation as they swirl about this central core of attraction. 

* * *



Key Metaphysical Interpretations 

• Transition and Unity: The octagon bridges the square (representing the material world, stability, and earth) and the circle (representing the spiritual world, eternity, and heaven). It is the point where one energy begins its transformation into another, uniting these two fundamental concepts. 
• Sacred geometry: The most common metaphysical interpretation is that the octagon is a mediating form between the square (Earth, matter) and the circle (heaven, spirit). This makes it a symbol of the spiritual path toward enlightenment or the unification of material and spiritual existence. 
• Regeneration and Cycle Completion: The shape is a symbol of regeneration and structured renewal, marking the completion of a universal cycle and the commencement of a new one. 
• Spiritual Growth and Defense: In Feng Shui, an octagonal mirror is recommended for protection against negative spiritual activity. The form's multiple angles are also associated with comprehensive awareness, defensiveness, and a readiness to assess and yield momentum. 
• The Bagua Map: The Western Bagua Map, a tool for self-development, is also octagonal, with each of the eight sections relating to a different aspect of life that supports the individual. 

Balance and Cosmic order 
Wholeness: The eight sides of the octagon can represent a quest for wholeness by balancing different aspects of existence, such as intellect, emotion, body, and spirit. 
Google Research 

* * *

* * *

The mark of Design Consciousness is based upon the overlapping of two squares (regular quadrilaterals) of equal size representing the Yin and Yang energies of energy in motion. Together they symbolize the concept of duality, i.e. that which permeates all that can be known. Together they create the points and framework of an octagon. The thrust is of this energy is towards the northeast. 




 Design "Boilerplate"
States of Awareness - Design futures based upon Metaphysical Agencies



Designer's Mark



In the I Ching, the directions are often associated with elements, energies, and specific qualities. The northeast has a strong connection to the Earth element and the concept of stillness or quiet wisdom. It is linked to the idea of stability, grounding, and inner strength. 

* * *

Specific meanings associated with the northeast direction in the I Ching: 
Stability & Grounding: The northeast represents a place of solid foundation, where one can find inner clarity and balance. It is about being grounded, firm, and having a strong base from which to act. 
Quiet Reflection: This direction is also tied to introspection and calm, where one can find peace and clarity. It's a space for reflection, connecting to one's deeper wisdom, and evaluating situations without rushing to decisions. 
Transformation & Preparation: The northeast is seen as a transitional space, where you prepare for new cycles and developments. It has a connection to learning from past experiences and gaining insight to apply in the future. 

In many classical Chinese traditions, the northeast is linked with the 8th trigram, Ken (☷), which symbolizes mountains and stillness. The mountain represents immobility, which can help in fostering patience, stability, and mental fortitude. 

In practical terms, the northeast is often considered an auspicious direction for cultivating wisdom, understanding, and a strong sense of self before taking action.



 * * *

3 squares = 12 points (4 directions + 4 elements + 4 seasons)

Earthly experience

The dodecagon, as a twelve-sided polygon, offers the observer a holistic perspective of the three-dimensional world, creating a map for consciousness that reveals holographic pathways and non-measurable parameters. Such a synthesis reflects both ancient symbolic geometry and modern theories of holographic information (Bohm, 1980; Talbot, 1991). Light energy and information overlap, creating luminous layers that blur distinctions between measurable and immeasurable qualities—an interplay reminiscent of the observer effect and the entanglement of perception and matter (Barad, 2007; Wheeler, 1983). 

That which can be measured influences that which cannot, and vice versa. This mutual influence echoes the quantum indeterminacy that underpins consciousness theories linking cognition and energy fields (Penrose, 1994; Hameroff & Penrose, 2014). Within the linear 3D time spiral, each imagined state of consciousness gives birth to the next, forming a holographic sequencing of present, past, and future — an idea also found in process philosophy and cybernetic design (Braidotti, 2019; Hayles, 1999). 
* * *
Earthly Parameters


Being drawn to this center is an integral part of the design process. This focal point is symbolic of a holographic source and precursor to the entrance into another universe. After certain attributes are fully experienced, explored and understood as a single strand of consciousness woven within a string of universes, certain mysteries collapse upon themselves, which in turn reveal other attributes of a unique geometry, holographic representations and dimensional interpretation. 


At the hub of the dodecagon lies an unknown center — a source, akin to a black hole of awareness, symbolizing a metaphysical origin point. Recognition of this “center” parallels both mystical traditions and contemporary design thinking that seeks emergent meaning through iterative feedback loops (Verbeek, 2011; Latour, 2005). The pull toward this enigmatic center mirrors the creative process — a holographic design journey between order and potentiality.


" The dodecagon 
symbolizes time, its relationship to space and the location of energy in the form of holographic light and information. Together these referential points of quantum energy describe the qualities of the solar field. Holographic in character and designed by attraction and intention, each component triad (4) is an expression of a micro system that internally symbolizes the achievements of a larger macro system functioning in apparent balance. When the dodecagon is viewed within the constraints of this universe both time and space take on a new meaning and purpose. Time becomes the thread that sews all holograms together by making them apparent within the parameters of a virtual field of quantum energy (QFVPP). Time creates the condition. Time is the tool that brings meaning and purpose (design) into context when experiencing the three dimensional universe."


The symbolic completeness of twelve—found in DNA, the zodiac, time cycles, and cultural cosmologies—represents wholeness and systemic balance (Eliade, 1959). Within this geometry, the dodecagon becomes both an archetype and a design framework connecting microcosm and macrocosm, each reflecting the other (Floridi, 2014). When viewed through the lens of metaphysical design, time itself becomes a tool—a medium that weaves holographic experiences into a unified quantum field (Bohm, 1980; Wheeler, 1983).

12 Transcendent Design Principles (Dodecagon)
Truth, Beauty, Goodness
Light, Power, Love
Emotion, Intuition, Intelligence
Believing, Feeling, Knowing

Humanity Transcendent




The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

References (APA 7th Edition) 
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge. 
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press. 
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. 
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. 
Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford University Press. 
Talbot, M. (1991). The holographic universe. Harper Perennial. 
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press.
(Moralizing Technology and the ethics of things / Peter-Paul Verbeek / TEDxTwenteU) 
Wheeler, J. A. (1983). Law without law. In J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 182–213). Princeton University Press. 

* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous







Edited: 10.30.2025, 11.08.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 





Wednesday, September 24, 2025

Abstract Technology and the Designer's Role


Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

What is considered Abstract Technology?
In the context of design consciousness and its relationship with AI, the term abstract technology typically refers to technologies that are not immediately tangible or physical but instead operate on conceptual, systemic, or algorithmic levels. These technologies influence how we perceive, create, and interact with the world—especially through information structures, computational logic, and invisible infrastructures. 

1. Algorithmic Systems 
These are sets of rules or computations that govern behavior and decision-making, especially within AI. The design of an algorithm is abstract—its impact is visible (e.g., in search results, recommendations), but the system itself remains invisible. 
Example: A recommendation engine shaping user behavior through invisible logic. 

2. Data Structures and Ontologies 
These are conceptual frameworks for how information is categorized, stored, and retrieved. In AI, how data is labeled, sorted, and related (e.g., in a neural network or database) deeply impacts both functionality and user perception. 
Example: The classification system behind an AI image recognition tool. 

3. Machine Learning Models
Models like GPT, diffusion models, or reinforcement learning agents are built from abstract representations of language, behavior, or the world. Their structure and training processes are not directly visible but are central to how AI interprets or generates meaning. 
Example: GPT "understanding" a query through high-dimensional vector space. 

4. User Interface Logic and UX Flows 
The structure and flow of digital interfaces are abstractly designed—users experience outcomes, but the logic trees and decision structures behind those interfaces are conceptual in nature. 
Example: AI-assisted design tools predicting what a user wants to create before they know it themselves. 

5. Ethical Frameworks and Governance Systems 
Abstract technology also includes the normative structures embedded in AI—how ethics, bias mitigation, or transparency are programmed (or not) into systems. 
Example: The ethical constraints embedded into autonomous vehicle decision-making. 

6. AI Consciousness Simulations (Theoretical) When exploring design consciousness, we may refer to the design of systems that simulate or model consciousness. These are extremely abstract, as they involve representations of awareness, intention, or self-modeling in AI systems. 
Example: An AI system designed to reflect on its own decision-making or simulate empathy. 

Relationship with Design Consciousness 
In design consciousness, creators and thinkers become aware of not just how things look or function, but how systems shape meaning, agency, and experience. Abstract technologies are crucial here because they mediate perception and agency invisibly, often outside user awareness. 

So, abstract technology in this context is the immaterial layer of computation, logic, and structure that defines how AI operates—and how we, as users or designers, relate to it.

* * *

Designer & AI Relationships: From Tools to Co-Evolutionary Partners 

The relationship between designers and artificial intelligence (AI) is undergoing a profound transformation, moving beyond the simple framework of human control over technical instruments. As AI systems become increasingly generative, adaptive, and context-sensitive, the dynamics of design practice shift toward more nuanced partnerships. These relationships may be framed along a continuum that spans from traditional tool-use to co-evolutionary collaboration, with ethical stewardship acting as an essential counterbalance throughout. 

AI as Instrument and Extension 

The most foundational relationship between designer and AI is that of tool and user. In this paradigm, AI serves as a powerful extension of human intention, enabling designers to automate routine or technical aspects of their work—such as layout optimization, prototyping, and parameter exploration. This framework reflects what Shneiderman (2020) has described as human-centered artificial intelligence, where the role of AI is to enhance human performance while maintaining reliability, safety, and trustworthiness. The designer, in this sense, retains full creative agency, positioning AI as an advanced but still subordinate instrument. 

AI as Collaborative Partner 

As AI technologies evolve, however, they increasingly operate in ways that exceed the tool metaphor. Contemporary design practice often involves AI systems capable of generating novel patterns, forms, or solutions that surprise even their creators. In these contexts, AI can be conceptualized as a collaborative partner, one that contributes to the ideation process alongside human creativity. Davis et al. (2021) argue that co-creativity arises through interaction dynamics, where the iterative exchange between human and machine generates outcomes neither could have produced independently. This collaborative model destabilizes traditional hierarchies of authorship, suggesting a more dialogical form of creativity. 

AI as Creative Catalyst 

Beyond collaboration, AI can also act as a provocateur or catalyst for new ideas. By producing outputs that diverge from established human expectations, AI systems challenge designers to reconsider assumptions, aesthetic conventions, and conceptual boundaries. Colton and Wiggins (2012) position this role within the broader field of computational creativity, where AI functions less as a passive servant and more as an active agent capable of generating novelty. In this way, the relationship becomes less about efficiency and more about inspiration, allowing designers to leverage AI as a source of unexpected creative disruption.



AI and Co-Evolutionary Design 

The relationship between designers and AI is not static but inherently adaptive. Designers train, fine-tune, and guide AI systems, while at the same time AI reshapes the practices, skills, and sensibilities of designers themselves. This co-evolutionary dynamic reflects what Candy and Edmonds (2018) describe as the future of practice-based creative research, wherein human and machine adapt to one another in an ongoing feedback loop. Here, the boundaries between human agency and machine affordances blur, pointing toward a hybrid model of design where creativity emerges from mutual adaptation. 

The Ethical Counterpart 

While much discussion emphasizes creativity and efficiency, the designer’s role in relation to AI must also be understood as one of ethical responsibility. AI systems are not value-neutral; they reflect the biases of their training data and the intentions of their creators. Designers thus act as ethical stewards, embedding considerations of justice, equity, and accountability into their collaborations with AI. Brennen (2020) highlights the urgent need to address misinformation, manipulation, and social harm in the digital era—an imperative that extends to the domain of design. In this respect, the relationship between designer and AI becomes one not only of co-creation but also of critical oversight. 

Conclusion 

The relationship between designers and AI cannot be reduced to a single static model. Instead, it spans a spectrum that begins with instrumental tool-use, extends through collaborative and catalytic partnerships, and evolves into reflexive co-adaptation. Overlaying all of these dimensions is the ethical imperative, where designers must critically engage with the implications of their collaborations. As AI continues to evolve, so too will the relational landscape of design, pointing toward futures where human creativity and artificial intelligence are inseparably intertwined. 

References 

Brennen, J. S. (2020). Making sense of lies, misinformation, and conspiracy theories in the digital age. Media and Communication, 8(2), 1–4.

Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts: Foundations and futures from the front line. Leonardo, 51(1), 63–69. 

Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: The final frontier? In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 21–26). 

Davis, N., Hsiao, C.-P., Yashraj Singh, K., Li, L., & Magerko, B. (2021). Creative sense-making: Quantifying interaction dynamics in co-creative systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 149, 102605.  

Shneiderman, B. (2020). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. 

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous




Edited: Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.