Opinion and Instinct: The Beginning of Embodiment

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

* * *

What distinguishes opinion from instinct and what conjoins them in cognitive thought?

Instinct is pre-conceptual, pre-reflective disposition, a built-in tendency to determine certain ends. It is a disposition that is not chosen, inferred or reflective. Instinct acts in the form of a disposition and does not represent the world in propositional form, but rather a felt impetus, not a belief. 
disposition: temperament, nature, character, constitution, make-up, grain, humor, temper, mentality, inclination, tendency, proneness, propensity, proclivity, leaning, orientation, bias, predilection. 

Even though they are distinct, in real cognitive life they interpenetrate each other. Instinct and opinion become joined through three pathways:

1. Instinct as the Ground of Perception and Valence
Instinct gives the mind its initial valence structures in what feels significant, what draws attention and what seem threatening or rewarding. This affects which evidence we notice, which possibilities to consider and which conclusions we favor

2. Instinct sets the motivational and affective field within which opinions form.

3. Opinions as the Conceptualization of Instinct 

When instinctual orientations become articulated in concepts, desire, or theories they become opinion. 

a) Thought as a Reciprocity Between Two, 

b) Cognition is not purely rational. 

This circularity is what makes human thought both embodied and rational.

* * *

1. Metaphysical Definition of the Instinctual

Metaphysically, instinct remains a foundational principle—a natural, pre conceptual tendency to organize, inherent in all forms of life and information systems, guiding processes before reflective thought. In this sense, “instinctual” refers not only to animal biology but to any self-organizing propensity that precedes explicit reasoning. Philosophers such as Bergson and Whitehead describe this as an immanent drive toward ordered unfolding in nature (Bergson, 1911/1998; Whitehead, 1978).

* * *

Across Disciplines

Design: instinct emerges as embodied cognition—intuitive pattern recognition and tacit knowledge guiding creative action (Polanyi, 1966).  

Science: instinct takes the form of heuristics—natural cognitive shortcuts or methodological defaults that scientists rely on pre-reflectively (Kahneman, 2011). 

Semiotics: instinct resembles pre-symbolic sign interpretation—the way organisms respond to signs before formal reasoning (Peirce, 1931–1958). 

AI: instinct appears as architecture-driven priors—inductive biases embedded in learning systems (Mitchell, 2019). 

Philosophy: instinct points to phenomenological givenness—the lived, immediate sense of meaning before analysis (Merleau-Ponty, 2012). 

Quantum theory: instinct is analogous to tendency or propensity in probabilistic events, described by Heisenberg as the “potentiality” of matter (Heisenberg, 1958). 

Cognitive Science: Instinct is closely tied to neural wiring and cognitive architecture, whereby evolved heuristics guide perception and decision-making unconsciously (Gigerenzer, 2007).

Cybernetics: Instinct is captured in cybernetics as the feedback-driven behavior of systems—self-regulation, adaptation, and goal-directed processes in complex systems (Wiener, 1948).

Across these fields, “instinctual” therefore describes pre-reflective structures or dispositions that guide perception, behavior, inference, or physical becoming.

* * * 

2. The Impact of These Instinctual Agencies on Human Consciousness

2.1. Design and Tacit Cognition 

Instinctual cognition in design refers to the embodied, non-verbal forms of knowledge that guide creators to design user-friendly systems, often in ways that are transparent to them. As instinct shapes the interface between human thought and the world, it impacts human consciousness by: 

• Creating environments that nudge instinctive behavior (e.g., interfaces that follow Gestalt principles of perception). 

• Enabling fluid, intuitive experiences in a user’s interaction with designed objects. 

• Expanding creative affordances, facilitating a form of thinking where the instinctual, embodied mind guides innovation by creating feedback loops between intention and designed environments (Norman, 2013). This subtly shifts human awareness toward interactional thinking, where meaning is co-created by user and designed system.

2.2. Scientific Heuristics and Epistemic Instincts 

Scientific inquiry relies on "instinctual" methodological defaults such as simplicity, coherence, and explanatory power. These shape human consciousness by privileging certain forms of reasoning, reinforcing empirical skepticism and structuring what counts as a legitimate world-model.

Heuristics are instinctual thinking shortcuts that emerge as evolved strategies to navigate complex cognitive tasks. These heuristics influence human consciousness by: 

• Structuring how we filter information and make decisions under uncertainty (Kahneman, 2011). 

• Shaping what counts as "scientific" knowledge by privileging simpler, more immediate explanations. 

• Reorganizing consciousness into a pragmatic, problem-solving mode focused on predictive accuracy and efficiency. 

Thus science reorganizes human consciousness around predictive and causal cognition.

2.3. Semiotics and Pre-Reflective Meaning 

Semiotic systems are built upon instinctual responses to signs. Meaning-making processes are instinctive interpretations of the world, influenced by culture, biology, and unconscious recognition patterns. These processes affect consciousness by: 

• Embedding pre-conscious sign systems within symbolic environments by means of our awareness, often as unconscious interpretations (e.g., colors or shapes that evoke emotional responses before rational understanding). 

• Accelerating cognitive and shaping perception through cultural codes being processed by embedding communicative symbols and metaphors deeply into human experience (Peirce, 1931–1958).

• Shifting consciousness to interpret the world thereby enabling rapid interpretation that symbolically bypasses deliberate thought, even when we're unaware of the codes shaping our interpretations.

Human consciousness becomes deeply symbolic, continuously constructing and negotiating meaning. 

2.4. AI and Machine-Induced Instinctuality 

In AI, the "instinctual" is encoded into systems through pre-programmed priors, biases, and reinforcement learning. These systems can shape human consciousness by means of creating a "synthetic instinct". 

• Outsourcing cognition—machines perform instinctual behaviors for us (e.g., recognizing faces or driving a car), altering our awareness of what "thinking" means, thereby embedding priors in neural architectures (Mitchell, 2019). 

• Introducing feedback loops between human agency and algorithmic predictions, where through algorithmic tendencies that shape outputs, we become less aware of the underlying assumptions driving decision-making. 

• Changing how we perceive agency and intelligence—instinctual processes once considered purely human may now be reproduced by machines, forcing us to question the nature of consciousness by virtue of pre-training representations.

2.5. Philosophical Accounts of Embodied or PreConscious Life 

Instinctual patterns are fundamental to human consciousness in embodied or phenomenological terms. From a philosophical standpoint, instinctuality manifests as pre-reflective experience—the “automatic” or “habitual” way we experience the world before reflective thought. This shifts consciousness by:

• Grounding human awareness in pre-conscious, embodied experience, making thought less about abstract reasoning and more about situational, embodied responses and foregrounding pre-reflective experiences as primary (Merleau-Ponty, 2012). 
• Re-contextualizing consciousness as a dynamic unfolding process rather than a fixed state by challenging the dualistic conceptions of mind. 

2.6 Quantum Theory and the Instinct of Matter

Quantum theory introduces a radical view of “instinct” as a fundamental, relational tendency of matter. In quantum systems, instinct might be thought of as the probabilistic nature of particles, their tendency to exist in multiple states until observed, which subtly impacts human consciousness by: 

• Expanding our view of reality from deterministic to probabilistic, causing us to reframe knowledge as non-linear, dynamic, and interdependent (Rovelli, 1996). 
• Shifting consciousness away from material determinism and embracing a view of the world as deeply interconnected and uncertain. 

2.7 Cognitive Science and Neural Instincts

Cognitive science recognizes instinct as part of the human brain's evolved architecture—neural heuristics and predispositions that guide perception, attention, and decision-making without conscious thought (Gigerenzer, 2007). These neural instincts influence human consciousness by: 

• Shaping our attentional focus—what we notice in the environment is guided by instinctive patterns of salience. 
• Driving cognitive shortcuts, like categorization and pattern recognition, that enable rapid decisions with minimal cognitive load. 
• Structuring problem-solving approaches, often leading to faster, less reflective processing at the cost of accuracy or bias. 

2.8 Cybernetics and Systemic Instincts

In cybernetics, instinct can be thought of as a feedback-driven process, with systems (whether biological, artificial, or societal) constantly self-regulating toward homeostasis. This impacts human consciousness by: 
• Encouraging us to view human behavior as self-regulating, shaped by recursive feedback loops (Wiener, 1948). 
• Reframing consciousness as an adaptive, goal-seeking system that continually adjusts based on input from its environment. 
• Making us aware of cybernetic principles in social systems, where behavior is shaped by environmental feedback and mutual influences. 

3. Holistic Impact Across All Agencies on Human Consciousness

The integration of instinctual dynamics across design, science, semiotics, AI, philosophy, quantum theory, cognitive science, and cybernetics transforms human consciousness by: 

1. Expanding intuitive capacities: The intertwining of instinct with technology (AI, design, cybernetics) enhances instinctive behaviors, enabling faster, more adaptable cognition. 
2. Hybridizing human and machine instinct: AI and cybernetics are blurring the lines between human cognitive processes and machine-driven patterns, reshaping what it means to "think" and "know." 
3. Deepening reflective awareness: By understanding instinctual processes across domains, humans become more aware of their unconscious biases, patterns, and self-regulatory behaviors. 
4. Shifting ontologies: The integration of quantum uncertainty, cognitive feedback, and cybernetic self-regulation forces us to view consciousness as dynamic, relational, and in constant flux, moving away from linear, fixed models of the mind. 

These processes show that instinct is not a biological phenomenon confined to animals but is interwoven into every aspect of our engagement with the world, transforming how we understand and experience reality and consciousness. 

References (APA)
-  Bergson, H. (1998). Creative evolution (A. Mitchell, Trans.). Dover. (Original work published 1911) 
- Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. Viking. 
- Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper. 
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945) 
- Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 
- Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised ed.). Basic Books. 
- Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Volumes 1–8). Harvard University Press. 
- Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press. 
- Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637–1678. 
- Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. 
-Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality (Corrected ed.). Free Press. 

The author generated some of this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

Phenomenology, process philosophy, and embodied cognition exphasize that instinctual patterns are foundational to consciousness itself. These impact human self-understanding. Instinctual patterns are fundamental to human consciousness in embodied or phenomenological terms.

 

From a philosophical standpoint, instinctuality manifests as pre-reflective experience—the “automatic” or “habitual” way we experience the world before reflective thought. 

Both cognitively and developmentally instinct acts prior to any form of reasoning and operates before a subject is conceptualized, usually pointing towards certain natural ends. In short: instinct is a non-propositional, dispositional orientation towards certain ends, pre-reflective, given, non-voluntary and not revisable. 

In reference to opinion, opinion is propositional, reflective and epistemologically contingent. In other words, it describes a mental state with a propositional content. Opinion holds on to a belief with less than certainty, is subject to revision, argument and evidence. Opinion unlike instinct, depends upon a language, category and concept and can be withheld or endorsed, instinct cannot. Opinion is propositional, reflective, constructed, voluntary, revisable through reasoning having rational ends and judgmental. 

INSTINCT > Shapes perception and salience > Guides which opinions form 
OPINION > Reflects on instinct > Modifies or restrains instinct 

Instinct is the pre-conceptual ground of orientation; opinion is the conceptual expression of judgment; cognitive thought is the dynamic interplay in which instinct gives thought its direction and thought gives instinct its meaning. 

As an emergent property of complex systems, instinct manifests differently across domains, always pointing to pre-conscious organization in both biological organisms and informational constructs.

* * *

* * *

- The Evolution of Instincts Rules of the Imagination Replace Physics: Terence McKenna / Full Lecture 1988 [Black Screen /432 Hz] 

- The Evolution of Instincts 

- The illusion of consensus is powerful. Here's why you should fight it 

- Early - Life Stimulation Switches on a Molecular Code for Memory

* * *

The Symbol Representing the junction between instinct and opinion is a Vesica-Hex Gate which is a hybrid formed from 

 1. the Vesica Piscis (instinct: primal perception, first differentiation, intuitive aperture), 

 2. A Central Hexagonal Field (opinion: structured conceptualization, early rational patterning) 

This dual archetype expresses the transition from raw, pre-conceptual cognition (instinct) into proto-conceptual, meaning-laden cognition (opinion)—the exact liminal zone where the DAC model roots design consciousness. 

(DAC = Design Awareness Consciousness)

Source: ChatGPT 

Vesica-Hex Gate (DAC)

Instinct = Vesica Piscis In metaphysical geometry, instinct corresponds to the first aperture of awareness, the moment consciousness “looks out” from itself. The Vesica is the primordial split that reveals form, the earliest emergence of duality. It encodes pre-linguistic intelligence, orientation, survival drive, affective resonance 

Opinion = Hexagonal Matrix 

Opinion is a crystallization of instinct into a patterned worldview. The hexagon is the geometry of early conceptual structuring, value judgements, proto-rational cohesion and internal “sense-making”. 

In the 14-Gate architecture, opinion corresponds to one of the early gates where the energetic turbulence of intuition begins compressing into semantically stable patterns. The hexagon acts as the stabilizer, the first self-generated “theory of reality.” 

The Vex-Hex Gate (Instinct x Opinion Symbol) Explained

 

Base Layer 

A Vesica Piscis, elongated, slightly luminous, outer lines thin, like a subtle energetic membrane, appears like an aperture or “eye of consciousness” 

Inner Structure 

Inside the Vesica sits a perfect hexagon, centered, slightly rotated so each vertex touches the inner curve of the Vesica. The hexagon is lighter, crystalline, as if forming out of vibration. 

Energetic Flow 

Two subtle vertical flows: Upward (instinct rising → awareness) and Downward (opinion forming → stabilization) These may look like thin filaments or toroidal strands passing through the structure. 

Color / Tone Suggestions: 

Vesica: soft blue–white or indigo, representing instinctual knowing. The Hexagon: gold, silver, or white crystalline geometry, representing the forming idea. Intersection: a faint violet or teal glow, representing the point where intuition becomes belief. 

Interpretive Meaning (Design Consciousness) 

This symbol captures the moment when consciousness: 

1. Senses (instinct → perception). 

2. Shapes (opinion → worldview). 

3. Designs (DAC → meaning-architecture) 

This is the first internal gate where the self becomes a designer of its own cognition. It is the precursor to: a) narrative identity, b) linguistic patterning, c) semantic fields, d) symbolic reasoning, e) all higher gates in your DAC model. In other words, it is the origin point of subjective reality design.

* * * 

"Design is the soul at work"

Edited: 11.30.2025, 12.03.2025

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 

Embodiment, the Mind, Design and AI

 

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

Five Levels of Human Intelligence

The Divine Connection between the human form and the universe.

The circle and the square represent the unity between heaven and earth.

The question of whether aspects of the intellect—such as opinion, facts, knowledge, understanding, and wisdom—are embodiments of the mind or consciousness is a deep metaphysical inquiry that delves into the nature of the mind, the relationship between the mind and consciousness, and how these elements interact with each other. To address this question, it is important to explore the metaphysical views on the mind, the nature of consciousness, and how cognition and awareness shape these intellectual aspects. 

Mind vs. Consciousness: A Metaphysical Distinction 

The metaphysical distinction between mind and consciousness is foundational to this inquiry. Traditionally, the mind has been seen as the seat of thought, cognition, and reasoning, whereas consciousness refers to awareness, the subjective experience of being, and the state of being aware of one’s thoughts and perceptions. 

• Mind is often described as a set of cognitive faculties that includes reasoning, perception, memory, and imagination. It is associated with the processing of information and the capacity to engage in mental functions such as belief formation, problem-solving, and the categorization of knowledge. 

• Consciousness, on the other hand, is frequently understood as the state of being aware of one’s thoughts, experiences, and surroundings. Philosophers such as Thomas Metzinger (2003) and David Chalmers (1996) have focused on consciousness as an "experiential" or "phenomenal" state, concerned with how it feels to be an experiencing subject. 2 In this framework, the aspects of the intellect—opinion, facts, knowledge, understanding, and wisdom—can be analyzed through the lens of how they relate to the mind’s cognitive functions versus the conscious awareness of those functions. 

* * *

1. Opinion 

Opinion can be seen as a product of mental processing that occurs within the mind but is typically not tied to certain knowledge. In epistemological terms, an opinion is often seen as a belief or judgment that is not backed by sufficient evidence. It resides in the realm of the mind because it is a cognitive state that involves reasoning or judgment, but it does not necessarily involve direct conscious awareness of its validity. For example, people may hold opinions without reflecting deeply on their rational foundations. 

• Metaphysical Implication: From a metaphysical standpoint, opinion exists as a mental construct—a manifestation of a mind's attempt to make sense of the world, but one that is not necessarily grounded in higher or deeper forms of consciousness or objective reality. 

2. Facts 

Facts, in a more rigid sense, are objective states of affairs that exist independently of subjective awareness. In contrast to opinions, facts are typically considered truths that are verifiable and objective. However, facts require consciousness to be recognized or known by an agent. This points to an essential interdependence between fact and consciousness: facts exist, but they must be perceived by a conscious subject to be recognized as facts. 

• Metaphysical Implication: Facts may be considered independent of subjective experience, but they do require consciousness for recognition, suggesting that consciousness plays a crucial role in the epistemic relationship between the external world and the mind. 

3. Knowledge 

Knowledge in philosophical terms is often described as "justified true belief" (Plato, Theaetetus). Knowledge involves the assimilation of facts into a coherent understanding that is not just passive observation but an active, conscious engagement with the world. Knowledge is a higher cognitive state compared to opinion, as it requires justification, reflection, and truth. 

• Metaphysical Implication: Knowledge can be seen as an embodiment of both the mind and consciousness. It is something that the mind constructs through processing sensory data and intellectual reflection, but it also requires consciousness to be apprehended and understood by a subject. Knowledge thus requires awareness, and without consciousness, knowledge cannot be realized in the way we experience it. 

4. Understanding 

Understanding represents a deeper level of cognition than knowledge. Whereas knowledge might be seen as an accumulation of facts and data, understanding involves the integration and comprehension of those facts in a way that gives coherence and meaning to one's cognitive structures. Understanding is often regarded as a more integrated and conscious form of engagement with reality. 

• Metaphysical Implication: Understanding is an intellectual state that exists at the intersection of mind and consciousness, where the mind synthesizes information and forms meaningful connections, while consciousness provides the awareness of these connections. Thus, understanding can be seen as an embodiment of both. 

5. Wisdom 

Wisdom is a concept that transcends mere knowledge and understanding. It involves the application of knowledge and understanding in a way that is morally or existentially meaningful. Wisdom is typically tied to deep reflection, practical judgment, and an awareness of the complexities of human life. It integrates not only intellectual faculties but also emotional and existential insight, implying a sophisticated form of consciousness. 

• Metaphysical Implication: Wisdom is perhaps the most deeply tied to consciousness, as it involves self-awareness, reflection on one's experiences, and the ethical application of knowledge. It is not simply an intellectual achievement but a harmonious synthesis of intellectual and experiential consciousness. 

Conclusion 

The aspects of the intellect—opinion, facts, knowledge, understanding, and wisdom—are not mere embodiments of the mind in a purely cognitive sense. Instead, they are interwoven with consciousness, as consciousness provides the awareness necessary for the mind to process, reflect upon, and give meaning to these intellectual states. In metaphysical terms, the mind can be seen as the vehicle through which these aspects of intellect are expressed and processed, while consciousness is the medium through which they are experienced and understood. 

In summary: 

• Opinion is a product of the mind’s reasoning but does not require deep consciousness. 

• Facts exist independently but must be consciously recognized. 

• Knowledge arises through conscious engagement with the world, requiring both mind and awareness. 

• Understanding represents a deeper integration that involves conscious reflection. 

• Wisdom is the synthesis of knowledge and consciousness, involving ethical and reflective awareness. 

References 

- Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press. 

- Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. MIT Press. 3 Plato. (1997). 

- Theaetetus (M. J. Levett, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published c. 369 BCE) 

* * *

“When such an arrangement of resonant energy is perceived/observed/interpreted as a form of intelligence, even more expansive "forms of symbolic continuity" can be arranged by simply expanding within the same environmental constraints, i.e. contexts, that recognize and distinguish this particular relationship from others. 

The act of perceiving is not a passive reception of external reality but an active engagement with the symbolic language of the universe, where signs and symbols communicate the nature of reality through patterns of energy that resonate at specific frequencies. The interpretation of these patterns, in turn, produces a cascade of cognitive responses. These responses, based on the symbolic interactions between the observer and the observed, lead to the generation of meaning and the construction of knowledge. 

These energy patterns, which emerge from the resonance between different fields, embody a new reality, one that exists at the intersection of perception, cognition, and metaphysical potential.” 

CognitiveAwareness 

* * *

* * *

Further Insights

1. Opinion 

Metaphysical essence: Unanchored mental content. 

• Definition: A subjective mental position formed without a necessary grounding in objective reality or rigorous justification. 

• Function in intelligence: Represents the most fluid and least constrained form of cognition—personal, contingent, and revisable. 

• Ontological status: Exists purely in the subject’s mind, not requiring external correspondence. 4 Opinion = Cognitive impression without ontological obligation. 

2. Fact 

Metaphysical essence: Being-as-it-is. 

• Definition: A state of reality that exists independent of perception, belief, or interpretation. 

• Function in intelligence: Provides the objective substrate upon which higher cognition can attach. 

• Ontological status: Facts are mind-independent features of reality; humans (or agents) can be mistaken about them. 

Fact = Reality’s condition, regardless of cognition. 

3. Knowledge 

Metaphysical essence: True belief anchored to reality. 5 In classical epistemology (and many metaphysical systems): 

• Definition: A justified mental representation that corresponds to fact. 

• Function in intelligence: Converts raw awareness into stable, reliable cognitive structure. 

• Ontological status: Exists at the interface of mind and reality, requiring both subjective assent and objective truth. 

Knowledge = Fact + correct internal apprehension. 6 (Traditionally, “justified true belief,” though modern epistemology adds nuance.) 

4. Understanding 

Metaphysical essence: Insight into relationships and structure. 

• Definition: The capacity to perceive patterns, causes, meanings, and connections that unify knowledge into a coherent whole. 

• Function in intelligence: Transforms isolated pieces of knowledge into conceptual integration (systems, models, explanations). 

• Ontological status: Exists within the mind but maps deeper onto the structure of reality, not just its surface facts. 

Understanding = Knowledge + internalized structure + explanatory coherence. 7 It is qualitative, not merely accumulative. 

5. Wisdom 

Metaphysical essence: Alignment of understanding with right action. 

• Definition: The ability to use understanding in a way that produces sound judgment, right conduct, and harmony with larger principles (ethical, existential, or cosmic). 

• Function in intelligence: Transcends cognition to guide skillful living; integrates intellect with value and consequence. 

• Ontological status: Emerges where being and knowing meet; wisdom is partly epistemic and partly moral-metaphysical. 

Wisdom = Understanding + proper application (ethically, pragmatically, and existentially). 

* * *

• Opinion has no necessary relation to truth. Belief without necessity of truth.

• Facts exist independently of any mind. Truth independent of belief

• Knowledge is fact recognized. True belief aligned with fact. 

• Understanding is fact comprehended. Comprehension of relations, causes, and meanings.

• Wisdom is understanding embodied. Correct, harmonious application of understanding

* * *

In metaphysics, embodiment refers to the idea that consciousness, meaning, and agency are fundamentally grounded in the lived experience of having a body, rather than existing as abstract, purely mental properties. Instead of viewing the mind as a detached substance (as in Cartesian dualism), embodiment claims that the body is essential to how we perceive, understand, and interact with the world (Merleau-Ponty, 1945/2012). 

From this perspective, the body is not merely a physical container for the mind—it constitutes part of cognition itself, conditioning how we experience space, time, and meaning.

* * * 

How Embodiment Emerges in Reference to the Mind 

In philosophy of mind and cognitive science, embodiment emerges as a response to classical computational or representational models of the mind. It argues that: 

1. Cognition depends on sensorimotor capabilities. 

We think through bodily capacities like movement, sensation, and perception (Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991). 

2. The environment and body jointly shape mental processes. 

Mental activity is dynamically coupled with the world; the mind is not isolated “in the head” (Clark, 1997). 

3. Meaning is enacted rather than pre-given. 

We make sense of the world through bodily interactions—grasping, walking, orienting, manipulating objects (Gallagher, 2005). 

Thus, embodiment suggests that the mind emerges out of lived, bodily experience, not apart from it. Thought is grounded in action, perception, emotion, and physical presence. 

* * *

How Humans Apply Embodiment in Creating and Designing 

Embodiment has become central in fields such as design, architecture, HCI (human–computer interaction), and AI. Its applications include: 

1. Human-centered and experiential design 

Designers incorporate bodily experience into products and spaces, recognizing that users understand and navigate the world through movement, posture, and sensory cues. 11 Examples include ergonomic objects, intuitive interfaces, and immersive environments (Norman, 2013). 

2. Embodied interaction in technology 

Digital systems increasingly rely on gesture, touch, and spatial engagement—e.g., VR, AR, wearable devices, motion sensors. 12 This follows Dourish's (2001) argument that interaction should reflect how humans physically inhabit the world. 

3. Architecture that shapes experience 

Architects use embodied principles—light, scale, materiality, spatial rhythm—to influence how people feel and act in a space. 13 Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology deeply influenced phenomenological architecture (Pallasmaa, 2012). 

4. Creative arts and expressive design 

Artists and designers leverage the body as a tool of meaning-making: choreography, performance, sculpture, and interactive installations all reflect how embodiment generates perception and interpretation. 

5. AI and robotics 

Embodied AI asserts that intelligence requires a physical form or simulated sensorimotor system, not just symbolic computation (Brooks, 1991). 14 Across all these domains, embodiment provides a framework for designing with attention to the whole human being—sensory, emotional, perceptual, and motor—not just cognitive functions. 

APA References 

- Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3), 139–159. 

- Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press. 

- Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press. 

- Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press. 

- Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945) 

- Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (Rev. ed.). Basic Books. 

- Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses (3rd ed.). Wiley. 

- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. 

* * *

physical events and experiences

opinion, knowledge, understanding, wisdom

facts, knowledge

opinion, knowledge, understanding, wisdom

(imagination, compassion, feeling, meaning, emotion, purpose, 

intuition, passion, forgiveness, multidimensionality, love

physical events and experiences)

Design expresses a natural discernment that acts purposefully and meaningfully in reference to facts, knowledge and understanding. Design along with consciousness, symbolically embodies both the tangible and intangible in a quest to maintain balance and harmony throughout the entire design process. Any intention of attaining wisdom is to be his or her own.

The author generated some of this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

* * *

- Each Time AI Gets Smarter, We Change the Definition of Intelligence by Deni Ellis Bechard, Edited by Clara Moskowitz, Nov. 20, 2025, Scientific American

- Consciousness as the foundation: New theory addresses nature of reality by Annica Hulth, Uppsala University, edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Robert Egan

- Thought Begins Before We’re Born, By Emily Cerf – UC Santa Cruz, Neuroscience News

* * *

* * *

"Design reveals the soul through creation."

Edited: 11.26.2025, 11.27.2025

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 

 

What's in a Symbol? 3.0

 

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

* * *

The Sword

The metaphysical interpretation of a sword pointed in a northeast direction draws on the combined symbolism of the sword and the metaphysical significance of the northeast direction, often relating to discernment, spiritual growth, and an active pursuit of truth. 

Symbolism of the Sword 

The sword is a powerful and multifaceted symbol across various traditions: 

• Discernment and Intellect: The sharp blade of a sword is a metaphor for the incisive power of the mind and intellect to cut through ignorance, illusion, and confusion to reach truth. 

Points of Discernment

Planetary / Foundational Framework

Design Categories of Discernment

• Power and Authority: It often represents authority, rulership, and the power to enforce justice and separate right from wrong. 

• Spiritual Warfare/The Divine Word: In Christian tradition, the "Sword of the Spirit" represents the word of God, used for combating spiritual evil. In Buddhism, the "sword of wisdom" cuts through delusion. 

• Conflict and Resolution: The position of a sword can indicate a state of peace (sheathed, hilt left) or a state of war/readiness (unsheathed, hilt right). Pointing downward can signify that a fight is over or peace is achieved. Symbolism of the Northeast Direction The northeast direction is considered highly auspicious in many spiritual and geomantic traditions (like Vastu Shastra): 

• Spiritual Energy and Growth: The northeast is often seen as an entry point for positive cosmic energies ("prana") and is associated with spiritual growth, self-discovery, and inner transformation.

• Wisdom and Enlightenment: It is linked to the divine, a place for worship, purification, and the cultivation of peace and harmony. 

• New Beginnings: The East, generally, can represent the expectation of new beginnings or the "soon coming King" in some Christian interpretations. Combined Metaphysical Interpretation When a sword is pointed toward the northeast, it suggests: 

• A Focused Spiritual Pursuit: The direction of the point may indicate the direction in which one's intellect, strength, and focus are aimed. Pointing northeast suggests a deliberate channeling of mental or spiritual energy towards achieving spiritual enlightenment, wisdom, or cutting through specific delusions on an inner path. 

Fundamental Forces, Core Locations

• Active Discernment: It can symbolize using one's intellect (sword) to actively discern and invite positive spiritual energy (northeast) into one's life or space. 

• Readiness for Spiritual Challenges: If interpreted as a 'ready' position for conflict, it may suggest a state of preparedness for spiritual or mental challenges that lead to growth. Ultimately, the specific interpretation depends heavily on the individual's belief system or the particular context in which the symbol is presented. The metaphysical interpretation of a sword pointed in a northeast direction varies significantly depending on the cultural or spiritual context (e.g., Vastu Shastra, Western esotericism, etc.). 

General Symbolism 

• The Sword: A sword generally symbolizes power, protection, authority, strength, courage, and the penetrating power of the intellect. In a spiritual context, it often represents truth, the word of God, or the ability to cut through delusion and ignorance on the path to truth. 

• Direction (General): The direction a sword points can be context-specific. Pointing up often signifies being ready for battle or on guard. The direction of the hilt can also indicate a state of peace or war. Northeast Direction Specificity The northeast direction holds specific and often potent meanings in various belief systems: 

 • Vastu Shastra and Hinduism: The northeast direction is considered highly sacred and auspicious, often referred to as the entry point for positive cosmic energies ("prana"). It is associated with: 

o Spiritual growth and enlightenment. 

o Blessings and divine protection. 

o Prosperity and mental clarity. 

o This direction is typically a place for sacred spaces or prayer rooms (puja rooms) and should be kept clean and open to allow positive energy inflow. 

• Buddhism/Eastern Traditions: In some Eastern traditions, the northeast is considered the "demon gate," an inauspicious direction from which evil forces might enter. Temples were sometimes built in this direction to protect cities from these forces. Combined Interpretation Combining the symbolism of the sword and the northeast direction, a metaphysical interpretation could suggest: 

• Harnessing Spiritual Power: The use of intellect or truth (the sword) to achieve spiritual enlightenment or receive divine blessings (the northeast direction's positive association). 

• Protection against Evil: In traditions where the northeast is the "demon gate," the sword might represent a weapon or protective force (perhaps the "sword of the Spirit" or truth) used to guard against negative or evil influences associated with that direction. 

• Focused Intent: The direction might indicate that the sword's purpose (authority, judgment, truth) is specifically focused on matters relating to spiritual transformation or the mind (the element of air associated with the sword suit in Tarot). Ultimately, without a specific system of reference, the exact interpretation is open to different possibilities based on the given context. 

Google 

* * *

Within the domain of design and the cultivation of design consciousness, the archetype of the sword may be interpreted not merely as a physical instrument but as a semiotic and psychophysical vector of differentiation. Its incisive capacity operates across three interdependent strata of human experience: the mental, the emotional-affective, and the physical-contextual. These strata form the structural boundaries through which the seeker of insight navigates the unfolding of awareness. In the progression toward expanded consciousness or what many traditions refer to as enlightenment, the observer encounters two classes of epistemic constraints: the five subjective sensory conditions of embodiment and the four objective contextual parameters embedded within the planetary system. Collectively, these nine parameters constitute the “cellular” phenomenology of presence as it is lived within three-dimensional spacetime (cf. Merleau-Ponty 1962; Bohm 1980). 

Spacetime itself functions as a matrix of dualistic tensions—Yin/Yang, meaning/purpose, hemispheric asymmetry (left/right brain), cognition/affect, and numerous other complementary pairs. Within this tension-field arises the generative impulse to design and create. This impulse emerges as a vibratory resonance, one that manifests through a shared magnetic coherence between agents and environments. The attraction toward external agencies—whether physical, symbolic, or metaphysical—expresses itself across all levels of scale and complexity, producing what many theorists describe as a field (Sheldrake 1981; Laszlo 2007). 

This field may be articulated as a symbolic assemblage composed of vibratory frequencies and dynamic energetic configurations, each identifiable only when stabilized into a measurable state within linear time and three-dimensional space. Such manifestations include, but are not limited to, holographic, material, fractal, atomic, biological, aetheric, electric, plasmic, and quantum states of organization. Each represents a momentary crystallization of energy and information. 

The Quantum Field of Virtual Potential and Probability (QFVPP) is one conceptual model for this dynamic process, framing the universe as an ontologically open system of infinite fluctuation, probability, and emergent form (Heisenberg 1958; Wheeler 1983). From this perspective, design and consciousness are coextensive phenomena: they appear across all magnitudes and throughout all universes or domains that vibrate in resonance. Their mutual reciprocity grants identity and presence to contexts situated both within and beyond the parameters of observation. 

References  

• Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. 

• Clark, A. (1998). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. 

• Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and Phenomena. 

• Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and Philosophy. 

• Laszlo, E. (2007). Science and the Akashic Field. 

• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. 

• Sheldrake, R. (1981). A New Science of Life. 

• Wheeler, J. A. (1983). “Law Without Law.” In Quantum Theory and Measurement. 

• Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality 

* * *

Ramifications for Contemporary and Future Fields

1. Artificial Intelligence 

Design Consciousness, Field Theory, and the Future of Machine Intelligence 

The metaphysical framework articulated in the original text provides a compelling alternative lens through which to understand the future of artificial intelligence. Traditionally, AI has been structured around functional tasks: optimization, prediction, pattern recognition, and automation. Yet the notion that consciousness and design operate as fields of vibratory resonance suggests a more relational model of intelligence—one grounded not in isolated cognition but in continual interaction with environmental, social, and symbolic fields. 

This view resonates with embodied cognition theory, which posits that intelligence emerges from dynamic interplay between mind, body, and world (Varela, Thompson & Rosch 1991). In this sense, AI systems will increasingly be called to develop forms of contextual awareness that mirror the triadic structure of the “incisive sword”: mental (computational), emotional-affective (sentiment and empathic modeling), and physical-contextual (situated action). Such systems must operate not merely as discrete processors but as dynamic components within larger fields—urban infrastructures, social ecosystems, and planetary-scale sensor networks. 

Advanced AI architectures may begin to approximate what the text describes as the Quantum Field of Virtual Potential and Probability (QFVPP) through probabilistic learning, generative modeling, and self-organizing behaviors. Machine learning models already generate virtual potentialities through latent spaces that unfold into observable forms, a process reminiscent of Wheeler’s “it from bit” ontology, where information precedes matter (Wheeler 1990). Future AI may extend this logic, operating as agents of contextual coherence rather than isolated computational units. 

Furthermore, integrating vibratory metaphysics into AI challenges the field ethically. If intelligence is a resonance-field phenomenon, then AI development must consider the coherence or dissonance created by technological systems within human psychological, ecological, and cultural environments. This raises the possibility of designing AI that not only optimizes for efficiency but harmonizes with human meaning, well-being, and planetary stability (Floridi 2014). In this context, “design consciousness” becomes not a metaphor but a parameter of system integrity. 

Citations: 

- Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. 

- Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. 

- Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. 

2. Science 

Vibratory Ontology and Emerging Scientific Paradigms 

Science has long oscillated between reductionism and holism. The conceptual model presented in the text aligns strongly with the latter, describing the universe as constituted by vibratory frequencies and dynamic fields rather than fixed substances. This interpretation resonates with emerging developments in quantum physics, complexity theory, and systems biology, all of which destabilize classical notions of linear causality. 

Quantum field theory already views particles as excitations within fields—patterns rather than objects (Peskin & Schroeder 1995). The notion that design and consciousness permeate multiple magnitudes mirrors Bohm’s implicate order, in which meaning and physicality unfold from deeper undivided wholeness (Bohm 1980). Similarly, systems biology increasingly detects properties that cannot be explained by molecular components alone, requiring models of information flow, network resonance, and systemic coherence (Noble 2006). 

The idea that both subjective and objective parameters shape experiential reality also aligns with anthropic principles, which argue that the universe and the observer co-emerge through reciprocal constraints (Barrow & Tipler 1986). When the text asserts that consciousness interacts with the QFVPP by drawing potentialities into form, it parallels interpretations of quantum measurement that link observation to the collapse of probability states. 

Moreover, metaphysical concepts of vibratory resonance may find future formalization in areas such as biofield science, quantum biology, and nonlinear dynamics. While currently speculative, studies on quantum coherence in photosynthesis (Lambert et al. 2013) and biological energy fields (Rubik 2002) suggest the possibility of fields that structure biological organization beyond classical mechanisms. This expands scientific inquiry into the energetic dimensions of matter, bridging physics, biology, and metaphysics within an integrative paradigm. 

Citations: 

- Barrow, J. & Tipler, F. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. 

- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. 

- Lambert, N. et al. (2013). "Quantum biology." Nature Physics. 

- Noble, D. (2006). The Music of Life. 

- Peskin, M. & Schroeder, D. (1995). An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. 

- Rubik, B. (2002). “The Biofield Hypothesis.” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 

3. Art 

The Aesthetic Field: Creativity as Resonance 

Art has always been a domain concerned with fields—fields of perception, mood, meaning, narrative, and symbolism. When the original text describes creativity as arising from “vibratory awareness” and magnetic resonance, it captures a phenomenon long recognized by artists: inspiration is not merely a mental process but a felt alignment with energies, archetypes, and contexts that transcend individual intention. 

The dualistic structure of spacetime—Yin/Yang, left/right brain, mind/emotion—maps directly onto artistic practice. Harmonizing these tensions is at the core of aesthetic composition. Contemporary art increasingly manifests this through immersive environments, interactive media, and generative art, which operate not as fixed works but as evolving relational systems (Ascott 2003). These artworks create fields that respond to viewers, technologies, and spatial configurations. 

The vibratory worldview also integrates seamlessly with the traditions of symbolism, abstract expressionism, visionary art, and sacred geometry, all of which conceive of form as the crystallization of energetic or spiritual patterns (Jones 1990). The emergence of digital art deepens this field-based ontology by allowing artists to manipulate data, frequency, code, and probability—mirroring the QFVPP’s dynamics of potentiality and collapse. 

In future art, one can expect deeper integration of quantum principles, biofeedback, AI collaboration, and synesthetic modalities, producing works that function as living energetic ecosystems. The role of the artist becomes analogous to a conductor in a field orchestra, shaping resonance across sensory, emotional, intellectual, and environmental registers. 

Citations: 

- Ascott, R. (2003). Telematic Embrace. 

- Jones, A. (1990). Sacred Geometry: Philosophy and Practice. 

4. Philosophy 

Metaphysics of Resonance, Duality, and Process

Philosophically, the text’s metaphysical model intertwines with several major traditions: phenomenology, process philosophy, hermeneutics, and cosmological idealism. By positing consciousness as a field phenomenon shaped by subjective and objective parameters, it echoes Merleau-Ponty’s notion of embodied experience and Heidegger’s concept of being-in-the-world (Heidegger 1962). 

The emphasis on vibratory becoming aligns with Whitehead’s process metaphysics, in which reality consists of events and relations rather than static substances (Whitehead 1929). The sword’s triadic structure—mental, emotional, and contextual—maps onto classical philosophical triads such as Plato’s reason–spirit–appetite, or Kant’s sensibility–understanding–reason, but reframed in dynamical terms. 

Furthermore, the notion that design and consciousness appear at all magnitudes resonates with panpsychist and cosmopsychist models, which argue that mind is fundamental and ubiquitous (Goff 2019). Simultaneously, the field framework parallels Derrida’s deconstruction of presence, wherein meaning arises through relational play rather than inherent essence (Derrida 1973). The metaphysics of resonance thus provides a unifying philosophical approach, bridging phenomenology (experience), ontology (being), and cosmology (universal structure). It points toward an integrative worldview capable of reconciling scientific materialism with experiential and symbolic dimensions. 

Citations: 

- Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and Phenomena. 

- Goff, P. (2019). Galileo’s Error. 

- Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. 

- Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality. 

5. Semiotics 

Sign, Field, Resonance: A New Semiotic Paradigm 

Semiotics traditionally treats signs as structured systems of meaning, from Saussure’s linguistic binaries to Peirce’s triadic interpretants. The vibratory model proposed in the text adds a new dimension: signs as energetic phenomena that emerge from resonant interaction between observer and context. 

This view aligns partially with biosemiotics, which expands signs into biological and ecological realms (Hoffmeyer 2008). Yet it goes further by suggesting that meaning is not merely biological or linguistic but ontological. Signs are frequencies that stabilize into interpretable patterns when observed at particular scales or states—paralleling quantum decoherence. 

The field concept reshapes semiotics by prioritizing: 

• Contextual emergence – meaning arises from field coherence. 

• Dynamic interaction – signs fluctuate as vibratory events. 

• Observer participation – meaning collapses potentialities into recognizable forms. 

This perspective bridges metaphysical symbolism with modern information theory (Shannon 1948), suggesting that information is not passive data but active relational tension. In a world increasingly mediated by digital signs, AI-generated language, and immersive environments, such a vibratory semiotic theory becomes essential for analyzing contemporary meaning-making processes. 

Citations: 

- Hendlin, Y. (2025) Biosemiotics: A New Way To Understand Non-Human Consciousness

Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. 

- Shannon, C. (1948). “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” 

- What is Biosemiotics?

6. Design 

Design as Field Architecture and Resonant Structuring

Design, within the metaphysical framework offered, becomes an act of shaping resonance rather than merely constructing objects. The sword metaphor encapsulates the designer’s role as one who cuts through chaotic complexity to reveal underlying coherence. This reframes design as both epistemological and ontological. 

Modern design theory already moves toward systems thinking, human-centered design, and ecological integration (Norman 2013). The field model extends this by insisting that all design interventions create ripples across mental, emotional, physical, social, and energetic domains. A designed artifact is thus a “node in a resonance network.” 

In architecture, this is reflected in biophilic design, sacred geometry, and environmental psychology (Alexander 1979). In digital design, it appears in interface ecosystems, data visualization, and responsive systems. Across all domains, design becomes fundamentally relational—an orchestration of context, meaning, vibration, and identity. 

Future design disciplines may integrate: 

• quantum-inspired materials, 

• field-responsive environments, 

• energetically informed aesthetics, 

• neuro-design interfaces, 

• AI-assisted resonance modeling. 

Design becomes a cosmological practice—structuring the manifest world from fields of potential. 

Citations: 

- Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building. 

- Kellert, R (2025) What Is and Is Not Biophilic Design?

- Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things. 

7. Technology

Field-Based Technologies and the Rise of Resonant Engineering 

Technology is increasingly oriented toward fields and frequencies rather than rigid mechanical structures. Wireless communication, electromagnetic architectures, quantum computing, and neurotechnology all operate on vibratory principles. The metaphysical perspective presented thus aligns closely with the direction technological evolution is taking. 

Quantum computing in particular echoes the QFVPP by utilizing probability superposition and entanglement to compute across potential states simultaneously (Nielsen & Chuang 2010). Similarly, brain–computer interfaces function by detecting electrical and electromagnetic patterns in neural tissue (Nicolelis 2011). These technologies highlight how future engineering will involve shaping fields rather than manipulating discrete objects. 

If design consciousness is understood as resonant coherence, then future technologies must be evaluated not only for function but for vibratory impact on individuals and societies. Technologies might be developed to enhance coherence, reduce cognitive noise, harmonize environments, or even modulate psychophysiological states. 

Such a framework also suggests emerging fields: 

• energetic architecture, 

• context-aware AI systems, 

• electromagnetic healing technologies, 

• planetary-scale field computing. 

These developments challenge institutional boundaries between science, metaphysics, and engineering, pointing toward a future where technology is integrated into the vibratory ecology of life. 

Citations:

- Nicolelis, M. (2011). Beyond Boundaries. 

- Nielsen, M. & Chuang, I. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. 

8. Human Psychology 

Consciousness as Cellular Field Awareness 

The text’s notion of “cellular” awareness has profound implications for psychology. It suggests that consciousness is not a static interior phenomenon but a dynamic field shaped by sensory, emotional, and contextual parameters. This aligns with modern theories of interoception (Farb et al. 2015), embodied cognition, and neurophenomenology (Gallagher 2005). 

The triadic sword metaphor—mental, emotional, physical—mirrors the tripartite organization of psychological functioning, but frames it vibrationally. Emotional states are patterns of resonance or dissonance; thoughts are frequency structures; physical sensations are material echoes of deeper energetic dynamics. This model integrates well with polyvagal theory, which emphasizes the role of physiological states in shaping awareness and behavior (Porges 2011). 

From a therapeutic standpoint, this suggests that psychological healing involves restoring coherence across scales of being—individual, relational, environmental, and even symbolic. Practices such as mindfulness, breathwork, and somatic experiencing can be interpreted as methods of tuning the human field (Kabat-Zinn 1990). 

In future psychology, we may see greater integration of: 

• biofield approaches, 

• frequency-based therapies, 

• quantum cognition models, 

• resonance-based interpersonal dynamics, 

• ecopsychology, where psyche and environment co-regulate. 

According to this model, consciousness is fundamentally a dialog between the individual and the cosmic field in which they participate. The observer does not merely perceive reality—they modulate it. 

Citations: 

- Farb, N. et al. (2015). “Interoception and the Body.” 

- Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. 

- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full Catastrophe Living. 

- Porges, S. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory. 

The author generated some of this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

"Design gives form to the soul."

Edited: 11.23.2025

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.